STAR à la Approval — 0/1 & marker ballots are legal on a STAR ballot¶
Generated from star_ala_approval.yaml — do not edit by hand. Regenerate: python STARVote_LH_tabulation_engine/tools_adam/scripts/build_yaml_pages.py.
Method: STAR (single winner) · 1 seat · Expected winner: D
Scenario¶
A STAR file (voting_method: STAR): it shows that approval-style 0/1 scoring and every ballot marker are LEGAL on a STAR ballot. Eight ballots exercise the whole marker set — blanks (-), a race abstention (~), an all-zero ballot, and a max-everything 5,5,5,5 — all tabulating as documented (markers count 0 and are reported honestly). D wins. For real Approval counting (most approvals wins), see 04_Approval/.
Ballots¶
Row 1 = candidate names; each later row is one voter's 0–5 scores (a N × prefix = N identical ballots).
Markers on these ballots: - blank · ~ race abstention · & candidate abstention · ? spoiled · % spoiled+reissued — all tabulate as 0 (reported honestly).
A,B,C,D
-,-,1,1
-,-,0,0
1,0,0,1
1,1,0,1
~,~,~,~
0,0,0,0
5,5,5,5
-,-,-,-
What the engine says¶
The count, step by step — the rounds and how the winner is reached:
[Divergence from STAR]
STAR = D
Choose-One (Plurality) = A (differs from STAR)
RCV-IRV = A (differs from STAR)
Approval = A (differs from STAR)
Note: 4 of 8 ballots (50%) had equal non-zero scores, so their ranks were
decided by candidate priority order. The RCV-IRV result may be an
artifact of score-to-rank tie-breaking rather than a deep
difference.
Note: Ranked Robin (RCV-RR) agrees with STAR, so RCV-IRV is the lone
outlier — the classic center-squeeze signature.
Full round-by-round reports (generated for review):
RCV-IRV rounds: cases_tabulated/star_ala_approval_RCV-IRV_tabulated.txt
--- STAR Voting Method (single winner) ---
[STAR Voting]
Tabulating 8 ballots. Note: 2 of 8 ballots are marked as abstentions.
A,B,C,D
-,-,1,1
-,-,0,0
1,0,0,1
1,1,0,1
~,~,~,~
0,0,0,0
5,5,5,5
-,-,-,-
('-' = left blank / abstained; '0' = scored zero — both count as 0 stars.)
[STAR Voting: Scoring Round]
The two highest-scoring candidates advance to the next round.
D -- 8 -- First place
A -- 7 -- Second place
B -- 6
C -- 6
D and A advance.
[STAR Voting: Automatic Runoff Round]
The candidate preferred in the most head-to-head matchups wins.
D -- 1 -- First place
A -- 0
Equal Support -- 7
D wins.
Runoff math:
8 ballots cast
− 7 Equal Support (no preference between the two finalists)
─
1 voters with a preference (majority = 1)
D 1 (100%) · A 0 (0%)
[STAR Voting: Winner — STAR Voting Method (single winner)]
D
Full audit — preference matrix, Condorcet, and score distribution¶
--- Runoff (Preference) Matrix ---
Head-to-head / pairwise comparison
Legend: For - Equal Support - Against
* indicates Top 2 Finalist
| * A | B | C | * D |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
* A > | --- |1 - 7 - 0 |2 - 5 - 1 |0 - 7 - 1 |
B > | 0 - 7 - 1 | --- |1 - 6 - 1 |0 - 6 - 2 |
C > | 1 - 5 - 2 |1 - 6 - 1 | --- |0 - 6 - 2 |
* D > | 1 - 7 - 0 |2 - 6 - 0 |2 - 6 - 0 | --- |
[Condorcet Winner]
Condorcet Winner: D — matches the STAR winner
[Condorcet Loser]
No strict Condorcet loser; jointly weak Condorcet losers: B, C (winless — pairwise ties)
[Score Distribution] (how many ballots gave each star rating)
Score
Candidate 5 4 3 2 1 0 Abs | Total Avg all Avg rated
A 1 0 0 0 2 1 4 | 7 0.9 1.8
B 1 0 0 0 1 2 4 | 6 0.8 1.5
C 1 0 0 0 1 4 2 | 6 0.8 1.0
D 1 0 0 0 3 2 2 | 8 1.0 1.3
Avg all = Total / all ballots — a blank counts as 0, so this is the Total the Scoring Round ranks on, per ballot.
Avg rated = Total / the ballots that scored this candidate (Abs excluded) — support among voters who had an opinion.
Everything in one file: the _tabulated mirror (regenerated on every run; every analysis forced on).
Run it yourself:
python STARVote_LH_tabulation_engine/starvote_larry_hastings.py 01_STAR/02_Examples/cases/star_ala_approval.yaml
See also¶
- Methods disagree on this election — its entry in the divergence review ledger
- Ballot & terminology basics
- Glossary · all cases by method
More cases in this set: 02a_c3_b1_three-candidates · 02b_c3_b2_three-candidates · 03a_c3_b3_style-bullet-vote · 03b_c3_b3_1_style-protest-vote · 03b_c3_b3_2_expand_style-protest-vote · 03c_c6_b8_style-gallery · 03d_c5_b5_style-gallery-five-more · 04b_c4_b3_display-options-all · 05a_c5_b3_unanimous-ballots · 06a_c9_b3_large-field-equal-support · 06b_c9_runoff-overturns-leader · 09_c4_b100_tennessee-capital · abstentions · bv2182_tg4779_faq_runoff_reversal · bv2184_fyy886_lunch_vote · bv2187_qrw6wb_ann-bob-cal · bv2256_c8h3tb_traditional_style · bv2263_xw23m9_over_50_percent · csv_ambiguity_ex1_c4_b8 · display_options_demo · equal_support_runoff_demo · quorum_demo_c3_b6 · quorum_fail_demo_c3_b6 · same_mean_different_spread_c2_b5 · three_winners_cw_score_runoff · vote_splitting · vote_splitting2 · vote_splitting3 · vote_splitting_scenario1_spoiler · vote_splitting_scenario2_bloc_leads · vote_splitting_scenario3_outsider_wins