====================================================================== SOURCE FILE: star_ala_approval.yaml TABULATED FILE: star_ala_approval_tabulated.txt ====================================================================== election_title: "STAR à la Approval — 0/1 & marker ballots are legal on a STAR ballot" scenario_description: |- A STAR file (voting_method: STAR): it shows that approval-style 0/1 scoring and every ballot marker are LEGAL on a STAR ballot. Eight ballots exercise the whole marker set — blanks (-), a race abstention (~), an all-zero ballot, and a max-everything 5,5,5,5 — all tabulating as documented (markers count 0 and are reported honestly). D wins. For real Approval counting (most approvals wins), see 04_Approval/. voting_method: STAR num_winners: 1 ballots: |- A,B,C,D -,-,1,1 -,-,0,0 1,0,0,1 1,1,0,1 ~,~,~,~ 0,0,0,0 5,5,5,5 -,-,-,- expected_winners: - D # file: star_ala_approval.yaml ====================================================================== TABULATION RESULTS ====================================================================== === STAR à la Approval — 0/1 & marker ballots are legal on a STAR ballot === A STAR file (voting_method: STAR): it shows that approval-style 0/1 scoring and every ballot marker are LEGAL on a STAR ballot. Eight ballots exercise the whole marker set — blanks (-), a race abstention (~), an all-zero ballot, and a max-everything 5,5,5,5 — all tabulating as documented (markers count 0 and are reported honestly). D wins. For real Approval counting (most approvals wins), see 04_Approval/. --- Runoff (Preference) Matrix --- Head-to-head / pairwise comparison Legend: For - Equal Support - Against * indicates Top 2 Finalist | * A | B | C | * D | ----------------------------------------------------------------- * A > | --- |1 - 7 - 0 |2 - 5 - 1 |0 - 7 - 1 | B > | 0 - 7 - 1 | --- |1 - 6 - 1 |0 - 6 - 2 | C > | 1 - 5 - 2 |1 - 6 - 1 | --- |0 - 6 - 2 | * D > | 1 - 7 - 0 |2 - 6 - 0 |2 - 6 - 0 | --- | [Condorcet Winner] Condorcet Winner: D — matches the STAR winner [Condorcet Loser] No strict Condorcet loser; jointly weak Condorcet losers: B, C (winless — pairwise ties) [Divergence from STAR] STAR = D Choose-One (Plurality) = A (differs from STAR) RCV-IRV = A (differs from STAR) Approval = A (differs from STAR) Note: 4 of 8 ballots (50%) had equal non-zero scores, so their ranks were decided by candidate priority order. The RCV-IRV result may be an artifact of score-to-rank tie-breaking rather than a deep difference. Note: Ranked Robin (RCV-RR) agrees with STAR, so RCV-IRV is the lone outlier — the classic center-squeeze signature. Full round-by-round reports (generated for review): RCV-IRV rounds: cases_tabulated/star_ala_approval_RCV-IRV_tabulated.txt --- STAR Voting Method (single winner) --- [STAR Voting] Tabulating 8 ballots. Note: 2 of 8 ballots are marked as abstentions. A,B,C,D -,-,1,1 -,-,0,0 1,0,0,1 1,1,0,1 ~,~,~,~ 0,0,0,0 5,5,5,5 -,-,-,- ('-' = left blank / abstained; '0' = scored zero — both count as 0 stars.) [Score Distribution] (how many ballots gave each star rating) Score Candidate 5 4 3 2 1 0 Abs | Total Avg all Avg rated A 1 0 0 0 2 1 4 | 7 0.9 1.8 B 1 0 0 0 1 2 4 | 6 0.8 1.5 C 1 0 0 0 1 4 2 | 6 0.8 1.0 D 1 0 0 0 3 2 2 | 8 1.0 1.3 Avg all = Total / all ballots — a blank counts as 0, so this is the Total the Scoring Round ranks on, per ballot. Avg rated = Total / the ballots that scored this candidate (Abs excluded) — support among voters who had an opinion. [STAR Voting: Scoring Round] The two highest-scoring candidates advance to the next round. D -- 8 -- First place A -- 7 -- Second place B -- 6 C -- 6 D and A advance. [STAR Voting: Automatic Runoff Round] The candidate preferred in the most head-to-head matchups wins. D -- 1 -- First place A -- 0 Equal Support -- 7 D wins. Runoff math: 8 ballots cast − 7 Equal Support (no preference between the two finalists) ─ 1 voters with a preference (majority = 1) D 1 (100%) · A 0 (0%) [STAR Voting: Winner — STAR Voting Method (single winner)] D