Vote splitting — scenario 1 of 3 — the spoiler strikes¶
Generated from vote_splitting_scenario1_spoiler.yaml — do not edit by hand. Regenerate: python STARVote_LH_tabulation_engine/tools_adam/scripts/build_yaml_pages.py.
Method: STAR (single winner) · 1 seat · Expected winner: DarkChoco
Scenario¶
A bloc that is a MAJORITY can still LOSE under Choose-One when it splits.
90 voters. 55 are chocolate lovers (a 61% majority), but they split across two chocolates — 30 for DarkChoco, 25 for MilkChoco. The other 35 prefer Vanilla.
Choose-One first choices: Vanilla 35, DarkChoco 30, MilkChoco 25. Vanilla wins with 38.9% even though 61% wanted chocolate — that is the spoiler effect.
STAR lets chocolate lovers score BOTH chocolates, so the bloc is not split and DarkChoco wins. Watch the [Vote-splitting check] confirm it.
Parameters (from the YAML)¶
blocs:
Chocolate: [DarkChoco, MilkChoco]
Ballots¶
The ballots as marked — the filled bubble is the score given, and the score is the number in its column:
| # | Ballot as marked | DarkChoco | MilkChoco | Vanilla |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() |
5 | 4 | 0 |
| 2 | ![]() |
4 | 5 | 0 |
| 3 | ![]() |
2 | 1 | 5 |
The same ballots as the file records them:
Row 1 = candidate names; each later row is one voter's 0–5 scores (a N × prefix = N identical ballots).
Count:DarkChoco,MilkChoco,Vanilla
30:5,4,0 # love dark, like milk, no vanilla
25:4,5,0 # love milk, like dark, no vanilla
35:2,1,5 # love vanilla, mild on chocolate
What the engine says¶
The count, step by step — the rounds and how the winner is reached:
[Divergence from STAR]
STAR = DarkChoco
Choose-One (Plurality) = Vanilla (differs from STAR)
[Vote-splitting check]
Choose-One first choices: Vanilla 35, DarkChoco 30, MilkChoco 25
Plurality winner: Vanilla (35, 38.9%)
Bloc 'Chocolate' = DarkChoco, MilkChoco: combined 55 (61.1%); winner Vanilla is OUTSIDE it.
=> VOTE SPLITTING: the 'Chocolate' bloc is an outright majority (55 vs
Vanilla's 35) but split across 2 candidates, so Vanilla won Choose-One.
STAR elected DarkChoco.
--- STAR Voting Method (single winner) ---
[STAR Voting]
Tabulating 90 ballots.
Count × DarkChoco,MilkChoco,Vanilla
35 × 2, 1, 5
30 × 5, 4, 0
25 × 4, 5, 0
[STAR Voting: Scoring Round]
The two highest-scoring candidates advance to the next round.
DarkChoco -- 320 -- First place
MilkChoco -- 280 -- Second place
Vanilla -- 175
DarkChoco and MilkChoco advance.
[STAR Voting: Automatic Runoff Round]
The candidate preferred in the most head-to-head matchups wins.
DarkChoco -- 65 -- First place
MilkChoco -- 25
Equal Support -- 0
DarkChoco wins.
Runoff math:
90 ballots cast
− 0 Equal Support (no preference between the two finalists)
──
90 voters with a preference (majority = 46)
DarkChoco 65 (72%) · MilkChoco 25 (28%)
[STAR Voting: Winner — STAR Voting Method (single winner)]
DarkChoco
Full audit — preference matrix, Condorcet, and score distribution¶
--- Runoff (Preference) Matrix ---
Head-to-head / pairwise comparison
Legend: For - Equal Support - Against
* indicates Top 2 Finalist
| * DarkChoco | * MilkChoco | Vanilla |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
* DarkChoco > | --- |65 - 0 - 25 |55 - 0 - 35 |
* MilkChoco > | 25 - 0 - 65 | --- |55 - 0 - 35 |
Vanilla > | 35 - 0 - 55 |35 - 0 - 55 | --- |
[Condorcet Winner]
Condorcet Winner: DarkChoco — matches the STAR winner
[Condorcet Loser]
Condorcet Loser: Vanilla — loses every head-to-head matchup — elected by Choose-One (Plurality)!
[Score Distribution] (how many ballots gave each star rating)
Score
Candidate 5 4 3 2 1 0 | Total Avg
DarkChoco 30 25 0 35 0 0 | 320 3.6
MilkChoco 25 30 0 0 35 0 | 280 3.1
Vanilla 35 0 0 0 0 55 | 175 1.9
Everything in one file: the _tabulated mirror (regenerated on every run; every analysis forced on).
Run it yourself:
python STARVote_LH_tabulation_engine/starvote_larry_hastings.py 01_STAR/02_Examples/cases/vote_splitting_scenario1_spoiler.yaml
See also¶
More cases in this set: 02a_c3_b1_three-candidates · 02b_c3_b2_three-candidates · 03a_c3_b3_style-bullet-vote · 03b_c3_b3_1_style-protest-vote · 03b_c3_b3_2_expand_style-protest-vote · 03c_c6_b8_style-gallery · 03d_c5_b5_style-gallery-five-more · 04b_c4_b3_display-options-all · 05a_c5_b3_unanimous-ballots · 06a_c9_b3_large-field-equal-support · 06b_c9_runoff-overturns-leader · 09_c4_b100_tennessee-capital · abstentions · bv2182_tg4779_faq_runoff_reversal · bv2184_fyy886_lunch_vote · bv2187_qrw6wb_ann-bob-cal · bv2256_c8h3tb_traditional_style · bv2263_xw23m9_over_50_percent · csv_ambiguity_ex1_c4_b8 · display_options_demo · equal_support_runoff_demo · quorum_demo_c3_b6 · quorum_fail_demo_c3_b6 · same_mean_different_spread_c2_b5 · star_ala_approval · three_winners_cw_score_runoff · vote_splitting · vote_splitting2 · vote_splitting3 · vote_splitting_scenario2_bloc_leads · vote_splitting_scenario3_outsider_wins


