Felsenthal Ex.3 District I — STAR: also Bruno¶
Generated from bv2147_9gdrqg_star.yaml — do not edit by hand. Regenerate: python STARVote_LH_tabulation_engine/tools_adam/scripts/build_yaml_pages.py.
Method: STAR (single winner) · 1 seat · Expected winner: Bruno
▶ Live on BetterVoting: vote · results ↗ (election 9gdrqg · test BV2147).
Scenario¶
Race 2 of 2 in District I of the Felsenthal Reinforcement-paradox trio (BV2147, bvid 9gdrqg; BV-confirmed). Source: Dan S. Felsenthal (2010), Appendix A2, Example 3 — see bv2147_9gdrqg_irv.yaml for the setup. The same 17 ballots with ranks mapped to 0–5 scores (5/3/1). Scores: Alma 47, Bruno 51, Cora 55 — Cora and Bruno advance, Bruno wins the automatic runoff 10–7. Same winner as the runoff procedure in this district; the reinforcement contrast appears at the combined stage (BV2149), where STAR stays with Bruno and the runoff procedure flips to Alma. Live results: https://bettervoting.com/9gdrqg/results
Ballots¶
Row 1 = candidate names; each later row is one voter's 0–5 scores (a N × prefix = N identical ballots).
Alma,Bruno,Cora
5,3,1
5,3,1
5,3,1
5,3,1
3,5,1
1,5,3
1,5,3
1,5,3
1,5,3
1,5,3
3,1,5
3,1,5
3,1,5
3,1,5
3,1,5
3,1,5
1,3,5
What the engine says¶
The count, step by step — the rounds and how the winner is reached:
[Divergence from STAR]
STAR = Bruno
Choose-One (Plurality) = Cora (differs from STAR)
Approval = Cora (differs from STAR)
RCV-RR = Cora (differs from STAR)
Full round-by-round reports (generated for review):
RCV-RR round-robin: cases_tabulated/bv2147_9gdrqg_star_RCV-RR_tabulated.txt
[Runoff Reversal]
- Score Round Winner(s) = (Cora)
- Runoff Round Winner = (Bruno)
Candidate Cora earned the highest total score, but
Candidate Bruno won the automatic runoff — not a malfunction,
STAR working as designed: the runoff elects the finalist preferred
by the majority (of voters with a preference).
--- STAR Voting Method (single winner) ---
[STAR Voting]
Tabulating 17 ballots.
Count × Alma,Bruno,Cora
6 × 3, 1, 5
5 × 1, 5, 3
4 × 5, 3, 1
1 × 3, 5, 1
1 × 1, 3, 5
[STAR Voting: Scoring Round]
The two highest-scoring candidates advance to the next round.
Cora -- 55 -- First place
Bruno -- 51 -- Second place
Alma -- 47
Cora and Bruno advance.
[STAR Voting: Automatic Runoff Round]
The candidate preferred in the most head-to-head matchups wins.
Bruno -- 10 -- First place
Cora -- 7
Equal Support -- 0
Bruno wins.
Runoff math:
17 ballots cast
− 0 Equal Support (no preference between the two finalists)
──
17 voters with a preference (majority = 9)
Bruno 10 (59%) · Cora 7 (41%)
[STAR Voting: Winner — STAR Voting Method (single winner)]
Bruno
Full audit — preference matrix, Condorcet, and score distribution¶
--- Runoff (Preference) Matrix ---
Head-to-head / pairwise comparison
Legend: For - Equal Support - Against
* indicates Top 2 Finalist
| Alma | * Bruno | * Cora |
-------------------------------------------------------------
Alma > | --- |10 - 0 - 7 | 5 - 0 - 12 |
* Bruno > | 7 - 0 - 10 | --- |10 - 0 - 7 |
* Cora > | 12 - 0 - 5 | 7 - 0 - 10 | --- |
[Condorcet Winner]
No Condorcet winner (majority cycle: Alma > Bruno > Cora > Alma)
[Score Distribution] (how many ballots gave each star rating)
Score
Candidate 5 4 3 2 1 0 | Total Avg
Alma 4 0 7 0 6 0 | 47 2.8
Bruno 6 0 5 0 6 0 | 51 3.0
Cora 7 0 5 0 5 0 | 55 3.2
Everything in one file: the _tabulated mirror (regenerated on every run; every analysis forced on).
Run it yourself:
python STARVote_LH_tabulation_engine/starvote_larry_hastings.py method_comparisons/felsenthal_paradoxes/cases/bv2147_9gdrqg_star.yaml
See also¶
- Methods disagree on this election — its entry in the divergence review ledger
- Runoff reversal (worked set)
- Glossary · all cases by method
More cases in this set: bv2144_mxfmhm_plurality · bv2144_mxfmhm_star · bv2145_6fj2kg_irv · bv2145_6fj2kg_ranked_robin · bv2145_6fj2kg_star · bv2146_krk2px_irv · bv2146_krk2px_ranked_robin · bv2146_krk2px_star · bv2147_9gdrqg_irv · bv2148_h87k6v_irv · bv2148_h87k6v_star · bv2149_byk9v2_irv · bv2149_byk9v2_star · bv2150_dxg8pb_irv · bv2150_dxg8pb_ranked_robin · bv2150_dxg8pb_star · bv2151_97hbpw_irv · bv2151_97hbpw_ranked_robin · bv2151_97hbpw_star · bv2152_r6ctvy_approval · bv2152_r6ctvy_ranked_robin · bv2153_pcttmr_approval · bv2153_pcttmr_irv · bv2153_pcttmr_ranked_robin · bv2154_wq6yv7_approval · bv2154_wq6yv7_irv · bv2154_wq6yv7_ranked_robin · bv2160_r6qc8h_plurality · bv2160_r6qc8h_star · bv2161_q3h4fk_plurality · bv2161_q3h4fk_star · bv2162_4htk44_irv · bv2162_4htk44_ranked_robin · bv2162_4htk44_star · bv2163_74j6vv_irv · bv2163_74j6vv_ranked_robin · bv2163_74j6vv_star · bv2164_xbqq8t_plurality · bv2164_xbqq8t_ranked_robin · bv2164_xbqq8t_star · bv2165_9vxcj7_plurality · bv2165_9vxcj7_star · bv2166_b7b8dv_plurality · bv2166_b7b8dv_star · bv2167_f3dxq9_plurality · bv2167_f3dxq9_star · coombs_ex18_monotonicity · coombs_ex20_amalgamated · coombs_ex20_district1 · coombs_ex20_district2 · coombs_ex21_twin_after · coombs_ex21_twin_before · coombs_ex22_scc · felsenthal_ex6_pareto_approval · felsenthal_ex6_ranked_robin · minimax_ex30_noshow_after · minimax_ex30_noshow_before · minimax_ex31_truncation · minimax_ex32_amalgamated · minimax_ex32_district2 · minimax_ex33_scc · succ_elim_ex10_amalgamated · succ_elim_ex10_district1 · succ_elim_ex10_district2 · succ_elim_ex11_twin_after · succ_elim_ex11_twin_before · succ_elim_ex12_sincere · succ_elim_ex12_truncated · succ_elim_ex9_noshow · succ_elim_ex9_pareto