Exercise 12 — Two seats, one neighborhood: Bloc STAR sweeps¶
Generated from ex12_bloc_sweep.yaml — do not edit by hand. Regenerate: python STARVote_LH_tabulation_engine/tools_adam/scripts/build_yaml_pages.py.
Method: Bloc STAR (multi-winner, majoritarian) · 2 seats · Expected winners: Asa, Bram
▶ Live on BetterVoting: vote · results ↗ (election 89wwvr · test BV2199).
Scenario¶
A neighborhood association elects a two-seat board. The north side (6 of 10 voters) runs Asa and Bram; the south side (4 of 10) runs Cleo and Dane. Bloc STAR fills seats by running single-winner STAR once per seat: seat 1 goes to Asa (30 points; runoff 6-0 over Bram with 4 Equal Support), then Asa is removed and seat 2 goes to Bram (runoff 6-4 over Cleo). The cohesive 60% takes 100% of the board — majoritarian by design, the right tool when the body must act as one and the wrong one when it should mirror the neighborhood. The companion file ex12_proportional_share.yaml reruns the same ten ballots under Allocated Score (STAR-PR): the south side's 40% earns one of the two seats. Exercise: ex12_bloc_vs_proportional.md. Ballots and cast are this repo's own. Live on BetterVoting (Test ID BV2199): https://bettervoting.com/89wwvr/results — one election, both races (Bloc STAR + STAR-PR); BV agrees on both seat pairs.
Ballots¶
Row 1 = candidate names; each later row is one voter's 0–5 scores (a N × prefix = N identical ballots).
Asa,Bram,Cleo,Dane
5,4,0,0 # 6 north-side voters: Asa first, Bram close behind
5,4,0,0
5,4,0,0
5,4,0,0
5,4,0,0
5,4,0,0
0,0,5,4 # 4 south-side voters: Cleo first, Dane close behind
0,0,5,4
0,0,5,4
0,0,5,4
What the engine says¶
The count, step by step — the rounds and how the winner is reached:
--- Bloc STAR Voting Method (2 winners) ---
[Bloc STAR]
Tabulating 10 ballots to fill 2 seats.
Count × Asa,Bram,Cleo,Dane
6 × 5, 4, 0, 0
4 × 0, 0, 5, 4
[Bloc STAR: Round 1: Scoring Round]
The two highest-scoring candidates advance to the next round.
Asa -- 30 -- First place
Bram -- 24 -- Second place
Cleo -- 20
Dane -- 16
Asa and Bram advance.
[Bloc STAR: Round 1: Automatic Runoff Round]
The candidate preferred in the most head-to-head matchups wins.
Asa -- 6 -- First place
Bram -- 0
Equal Support -- 4
Asa wins.
Runoff math:
10 ballots cast
− 4 Equal Support (no preference between the two finalists)
──
6 voters with a preference (majority = 4)
Asa 6 (100%) · Bram 0 (0%)
──────────────────────────────────────────────────
[Bloc STAR: Round 2: Scoring Round]
The two highest-scoring candidates advance to the next round.
Bram -- 24 -- First place
Cleo -- 20 -- Second place
Dane -- 16
Bram and Cleo advance.
[Bloc STAR: Round 2: Automatic Runoff Round]
The candidate preferred in the most head-to-head matchups wins.
Bram -- 6 -- First place
Cleo -- 4
Equal Support -- 0
Bram wins.
Runoff math:
10 ballots cast
− 0 Equal Support (no preference between the two finalists)
──
10 voters with a preference (majority = 6)
Bram 6 (60%) · Cleo 4 (40%)
[Bloc STAR: Winners — Bloc STAR Voting Method (2 winners)]
Asa
Bram
Full audit — preference matrix, Condorcet, and score distribution¶
--- Preference Matrix ---
Head-to-head / pairwise comparison
Legend: For - Equal Support - Against
Informational only — not part of the 2-winner count below,
so no Top-2 finalists are marked.
| Asa | Bram | Cleo | Dane |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Asa > | --- |6 - 4 - 0 |6 - 0 - 4 |6 - 0 - 4 |
Bram > | 0 - 4 - 6 | --- |6 - 0 - 4 |6 - 0 - 4 |
Cleo > | 4 - 0 - 6 |4 - 0 - 6 | --- |4 - 6 - 0 |
Dane > | 4 - 0 - 6 |4 - 0 - 6 |0 - 6 - 4 | --- |
[Condorcet Winner]
Condorcet Winner: Asa — matches the STAR winner
[Condorcet Loser]
Condorcet Loser: Dane — loses every head-to-head matchup
[Score Distribution] (how many ballots gave each star rating)
Score
Candidate 5 4 3 2 1 0 | Total Avg
Asa 6 0 0 0 0 4 | 30 3.0
Bram 0 6 0 0 0 4 | 24 2.4
Cleo 4 0 0 0 0 6 | 20 2.0
Dane 0 4 0 0 0 6 | 16 1.6
Everything in one file: the _tabulated mirror (regenerated on every run; every analysis forced on).
Run it yourself:
python STARVote_LH_tabulation_engine/starvote_larry_hastings.py 01_STAR/05_Practice/cases/ex12_bloc_sweep.yaml
See also¶
More cases in this set: ex01_district_combined · ex01_district_east · ex01_district_west · ex02_bella_exits · ex02_nine_ballots · ex02_tenth_ballot · ex03_five_verdicts · ex04_olympics_1994 · ex05_center_squeeze · ex06_bullet_backfire · ex06_bullet_honest · ex07_vanishing_votes · ex08_minimal_reversal_2c · ex08_minimal_reversal_3c · ex09_game_night_cycle · ex10_generous · ex10_reticent · ex11_spoiler_added · ex11_two_way_base · ex12_proportional_share · ex13_approve3 · ex13_approve4 · ex13_bullet · ex13_opinions · ex14_two_novels · ex14_two_novels_fullranks · ex15_approval_pairwise · ex15_approval_yes_no · ex15_score_profile