Exercise 11 — Recruit a spoiler: Axl enters the race¶
Generated from ex11_spoiler_added.yaml — do not edit by hand. Regenerate: python STARVote_LH_tabulation_engine/tools_adam/scripts/build_yaml_pages.py.
Method: STAR (single winner) · 1 seat · Expected winner: Alba
▶ Live on BetterVoting: vote · results ↗ (election 93gjx6 · test BV2198).
Scenario¶
The same nine voters as ex11_two_way_base.yaml, plus a third name on the ballot: Axl, a near-clone of Alba (recruited, in the exercise's story, by Brett's campaign to split Alba's vote). Alba's five-voter camp splits its FIRST choices 3-2 between the clones but scores both 4-5; Brett's four voters are unchanged. Choose-One now elects BRETT (4 first choices vs 3 and 2) — the spoiler worked. STAR shrugs: scoring round Alba 23, Axl 22, Brett 20 — the CAMP keeps both finalist slots and the runoff is Alba vs Axl, which Alba wins 3-2 (Brett's four voters score the clones 0-0: Equal Support). RCV-IRV also survives this one: Axl is eliminated first and his votes come home to Alba — crowding by pure clones is the one spoiler variant IRV genuinely handles. The dirty trick only pays under Choose-One. (Axl shares Alba's initial ON PURPOSE — they are clones; the distinct-initials naming rule yields to the lesson here.) Exercise: ex11_recruit_a_spoiler.md. Ballots and cast are this repo's own. Live on BetterVoting (Test ID BV2198): https://bettervoting.com/93gjx6/results — four races: Choose-One falls for the clone (Brett); RCV-IRV, STAR, and Ranked Robin all hold (Alba).
Ballots¶
Row 1 = candidate names; each later row is one voter's 0–5 scores (a N × prefix = N identical ballots).
Alba,Axl,Brett
5,4,0 # 3 voters: Alba's camp, Alba first among the clones
5,4,0
5,4,0
4,5,0 # 2 voters: Alba's camp, Axl first among the clones
4,5,0
0,0,5 # 4 voters: Brett's camp, unchanged
0,0,5
0,0,5
0,0,5
What the engine says¶
The count, step by step — the rounds and how the winner is reached:
[Divergence from STAR]
STAR = Alba
Choose-One (Plurality) = Brett (differs from STAR)
--- STAR Voting Method (single winner) ---
[STAR Voting]
Tabulating 9 ballots.
Count × Alba,Axl,Brett
4 × 0, 0, 5
3 × 5, 4, 0
2 × 4, 5, 0
[STAR Voting: Scoring Round]
The two highest-scoring candidates advance to the next round.
Alba -- 23 -- First place
Axl -- 22 -- Second place
Brett -- 20
Alba and Axl advance.
[STAR Voting: Automatic Runoff Round]
The candidate preferred in the most head-to-head matchups wins.
Alba -- 3 -- First place
Axl -- 2
Equal Support -- 4
Alba wins.
Runoff math:
9 ballots cast
− 4 Equal Support (no preference between the two finalists)
─
5 voters with a preference (majority = 3)
Alba 3 (60%) · Axl 2 (40%)
[STAR Voting: Winner — STAR Voting Method (single winner)]
Alba
Full audit — preference matrix, Condorcet, and score distribution¶
--- Runoff (Preference) Matrix ---
Head-to-head / pairwise comparison
Legend: For - Equal Support - Against
* indicates Top 2 Finalist
| * Alba | * Axl | Brett |
-----------------------------------------------------
* Alba > | --- |3 - 4 - 2 |5 - 0 - 4 |
* Axl > | 2 - 4 - 3 | --- |5 - 0 - 4 |
Brett > | 4 - 0 - 5 |4 - 0 - 5 | --- |
[Condorcet Winner]
Condorcet Winner: Alba — matches the STAR winner
[Condorcet Loser]
Condorcet Loser: Brett — loses every head-to-head matchup — elected by Choose-One (Plurality)!
[Score Distribution] (how many ballots gave each star rating)
Score
Candidate 5 4 3 2 1 0 | Total Avg
Alba 3 2 0 0 0 4 | 23 2.6
Axl 2 3 0 0 0 4 | 22 2.4
Brett 4 0 0 0 0 5 | 20 2.2
Everything in one file: the _tabulated mirror (regenerated on every run; every analysis forced on).
Run it yourself:
python STARVote_LH_tabulation_engine/starvote_larry_hastings.py 01_STAR/05_Practice/cases/ex11_spoiler_added.yaml
See also¶
More cases in this set: ex01_district_combined · ex01_district_east · ex01_district_west · ex02_bella_exits · ex02_nine_ballots · ex02_tenth_ballot · ex03_five_verdicts · ex04_olympics_1994 · ex05_center_squeeze · ex06_bullet_backfire · ex06_bullet_honest · ex07_vanishing_votes · ex08_minimal_reversal_2c · ex08_minimal_reversal_3c · ex09_game_night_cycle · ex10_generous · ex10_reticent · ex11_two_way_base · ex12_bloc_sweep · ex12_proportional_share · ex13_approve3 · ex13_approve4 · ex13_bullet · ex13_opinions · ex14_two_novels · ex14_two_novels_fullranks · ex15_approval_pairwise · ex15_approval_yes_no · ex15_score_profile