Skip to content

Rung 1 — two candidates: nothing can split

Generated from 07a_apples_two_candidates.yaml — do not edit by hand. Regenerate: python STARVote_LH_tabulation_engine/tools_adam/scripts/build_yaml_pages.py.

Method: plurality · 1 seat · Expected winner: Gala

▶ Live on BetterVoting: vote · results ↗ (election vq78wk · test BV2293).

Scenario

Nine people pick ONE fruit for the office basket. Seven of them want an apple; two want a banana. With only two names on the paper there is exactly one way to say "apple", so the apple people all say it.

Gala 7, Banana 2. The apple side holds 78% and wins with 78%.

This is the baseline every later rung is measured against. With two candidates, Choose-One, STAR, Approval, RCV-IRV and Ranked Robin ALL elect Gala, because with two candidates every reasonable method is the same method: majority rule. Vote splitting has not been prevented here — it is not yet possible. It becomes possible the moment a third name appears. Live results: https://bettervoting.com/vq78wk/results

Ballots

Row 1 = candidate names; each later row is one voter's 0–5 scores (a N × prefix = N identical ballots).

Gala,Banana
1,0   # apple person - would really rather have a Granny Smith
1,0   # apple person - Gala is genuinely their favourite
1,0   # apple person - would really rather have a Fuji
1,0   # apple person - would really rather have a Honeycrisp
1,0   # apple person - would really rather have a Pink Lady
1,0   # apple person - would really rather have a Red Delicious
1,0   # apple person - would really rather have a McIntosh
0,1   # banana person
0,1   # banana person

What the engine says

Full report from the _tabulated mirror (regenerated on every run; every analysis forced on):

--- Choose-One / Plurality Voting Method (single winner) ---
 Tabulating 9 ballots.

                                                           Gala  Banana 
  apple person - would really rather have a Granny Smith    X      -    
  apple person - Gala is genuinely their favourite          X      -    
  apple person - would really rather have a Fuji            X      -    
  apple person - would really rather have a Honeycrisp      X      -    
  apple person - would really rather have a Pink Lady       X      -    
  apple person - would really rather have a Red Delicious   X      -    
  apple person - would really rather have a McIntosh        X      -    
  banana person                                             -      X    
  banana person                                             -      X    

  Count the marks:  Gala 7 · Banana 2

Winner — Choose-One / Plurality Voting Method (single winner)
 Gala   (7 of 9 marks)

Run it yourself:

python STARVote_LH_tabulation_engine/starvote_larry_hastings.py method_comparisons/split_voting/_main/07a_apples_two_candidates.yaml

See also

More cases in this set: 00_plurality_vs_majority · 01_political_left_split · 02_icecream_chocolate_split · 03_lunch_veggie_vs_meat · 04_star_wars_vote_split · 05a_residual_split_bullet-voting · 05b_residual_split_expressive-fix · 06_sub_majority_not_spoiled · 07b_apples_six_candidates · 07c_apples_full_menu · 07d_apples_full_menu_star · 07e_apples_full_menu_approval · 07f_apples_full_menu_irv · 07g_apples_full_menu_ranked_robin · 08a_smallest_spoiler_plurality · 08b_smallest_spoiler_star · 08c_smallest_spoiler_ranked_robin · 09a_clones_are_voters_not_labels · 09b_same_ballots_grouped_by_label