Pets Governance — Mayor by Ranked Robin (1 seat): the Condorcet winner¶
Generated from pets_gov_ranked_robin.yaml — do not edit by hand. Regenerate: python STARVote_LH_tabulation_engine/tools_adam/scripts/build_yaml_pages.py.
Method: Ranked Robin (RCV-RR / Copeland) · 1 seat · Expected winner: Dog
▶ Live on BetterVoting: vote · results ↗ (election kcf8vf · test BV2134).
Official tie-break (lot) order: Dog > Cat > Fish > Bird > Rabbit > Hamster — consulted only if every deterministic tiebreaker stays tied (how the ladder works).
Scenario¶
One of six races in the Pets Governance election (BV2134, bvid kcf8vf; BV-confirmed). Same 22 voters, a 13-voter MAJORITY (Dog, Cat, Fish) and a 9-voter MINORITY (Bird, Rabbit, Hamster), voting ranked ballots. This single-seat Mayor race uses Ranked Robin (RCV-RR / Copeland). Because the 13-voter majority ranks Dog first and outnumbers the minority, Dog beats every rival head-to-head — the Condorcet winner. So the executive (Mayor) goes to the majority's choice even as the proportional Council races (STAR-PR, STV) seat the minority.
Ballots¶
Each row is one voter's ranking, most-preferred first (N: prefix = N identical ballots).
13:Dog>Cat>Fish>Bird>Rabbit>Hamster
9:Bird>Rabbit>Hamster>Fish>Cat>Dog
What the engine says¶
The count, step by step — the rounds and how the winner is reached:
--- Ranked Robin (RCV-RR / Copeland) Method (single winner) ---
Tabulating 22 ballots (ranked ballots).
Ballots:
13 × Dog > Cat > Fish > Bird > Rabbit > Hamster
9 × Bird > Rabbit > Hamster > Fish > Cat > Dog
Round-Robin — every pair, head-to-head (For – Against):
Dog beats Cat 13 – 9
Dog beats Fish 13 – 9
Dog beats Bird 13 – 9
Dog beats Rabbit 13 – 9
Dog beats Hamster 13 – 9
Cat beats Fish 13 – 9
Cat beats Bird 13 – 9
Cat beats Rabbit 13 – 9
Cat beats Hamster 13 – 9
Fish beats Bird 13 – 9
Fish beats Rabbit 13 – 9
Fish beats Hamster 13 – 9
Bird beats Rabbit 22 – 0
Bird beats Hamster 22 – 0
Rabbit beats Hamster 22 – 0
--- Pairwise (Round-Robin) Matrix ---
Head-to-head / pairwise comparison — the Ranked Robin tally
Legend: For - Equal Support - Against (row vs column)
| Dog | Cat | Fish | Bird | Rabbit | Hamster |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dog > | --- |13 - 0 - 9 |13 - 0 - 9 |13 - 0 - 9 |13 - 0 - 9 |13 - 0 - 9 |
Cat > | 9 - 0 - 13 | --- |13 - 0 - 9 |13 - 0 - 9 |13 - 0 - 9 |13 - 0 - 9 |
Fish > | 9 - 0 - 13 | 9 - 0 - 13 | --- |13 - 0 - 9 |13 - 0 - 9 |13 - 0 - 9 |
Bird > | 9 - 0 - 13 | 9 - 0 - 13 | 9 - 0 - 13 | --- |22 - 0 - 0 |22 - 0 - 0 |
Rabbit > | 9 - 0 - 13 | 9 - 0 - 13 | 9 - 0 - 13 | 0 - 0 - 22 | --- |22 - 0 - 0 |
Hamster > | 9 - 0 - 13 | 9 - 0 - 13 | 9 - 0 - 13 | 0 - 0 - 22 | 0 - 0 - 22 | --- |
Win–loss record — Copeland score = wins + ½·ties (highest score wins; ties broken by total margin, then lot order):
# Candidate W–L–T Copeland Margin Beats
1 Dog 5–0–0 5 +20 Cat, Fish, Bird, Rabbit, Hamster
2 Cat 4–1–0 4 +12 Fish, Bird, Rabbit, Hamster
3 Fish 3–2–0 3 +4 Bird, Rabbit, Hamster
4 Bird 2–3–0 2 +32 Rabbit, Hamster
5 Rabbit 1–4–0 1 -12 Hamster
6 Hamster 0–5–0 0 -56 —
Winner — Ranked Robin (RCV-RR): Dog
beats every opponent head-to-head — the Condorcet winner.
Full audit — preference matrix, Condorcet, and score distribution¶
--- Smith Set (the generalized Condorcet winner) ---
The smallest group whose every member beats every candidate outside it —
the honest answer to "who is even in contention?".
Smith set (1 of 6): Dog
Outside (5): Cat, Fish, Bird, Rabbit, Hamster
One member ⇒ Dog is the Condorcet winner, beating every rival head-to-head.
Ranked Robin (RCV-RR) winner Dog is INSIDE the Smith set. ✓
Guaranteed: Ranked Robin (Copeland) is Smith-efficient — every member of
the set outscores every outsider, so the top of the win–loss table is
always inside the set, however the tie among them is then broken.
More: 07_Concepts/topics/smith_set.md
Everything in one file: the _tabulated mirror (regenerated on every run; every analysis forced on).
Run it yourself:
python STARVote_LH_tabulation_engine/starvote_larry_hastings.py method_comparisons/pets_governance/cases/pets_gov_ranked_robin.yaml
See also¶
More cases in this set: pets_gov_approval · pets_gov_bloc_plurality · pets_gov_bloc_star · pets_gov_star_pr · pets_gov_stv