election_title: "Strategic 5-1-0 STAR, real moderate base — STAR STILL elects the CW"
scenario_description: |-
  The nuance rb-j's "the 1s contribute little" misses. Same 5-1-0 min-max
  strategy, but the moderate Beth has a real first-choice base (25, vs poles
  40/35). Now the 75 "1"s plus her 25 fives lift Beth to 200 — past Cole (175)
  and into the runoff — and she wins as the Condorcet winner. Under the identical
  strategic ballot, STAR elects the CW here while RCV-IRV does not (s5): the "1"s
  carry real weight, so 5-1-0 STAR is strictly more moderate-friendly than IRV.
  So "everyone votes 5-1-0 ⇒ STAR = IRV" is false as a general claim.
voting_method: STAR
num_winners: 1
bv_test_id: BV2223
bv_election_id: dyh93j
bv_results_url: https://bettervoting.com/dyh93j/results
ballots: |-
  Ana, Beth, Cole
  40 × 5, 1, 0
  35 × 0, 1, 5
  25 × 1, 5, 0
expected_winners:
- Beth

# file: bv2223_dyh93j_510_real_star.yaml