election_title: "Rung 4 — the same nine voters, scored 0-5: STAR elects Gala"
scenario_description: |-
  The identical nine voters and the identical eight-candidate menu as rung 3.
  One thing changes: instead of one mark, each voter scores every candidate 0-5.

  Nothing here is new information the voters invented for the occasion. The
  scores simply write down what rung 3's ballot never asked: an apple person
  likes ALL the apples and does not want the banana. Choose-One did not miscount
  those opinions. It never collected them.

  Scoring Round: Gala 29, Granny Smith 24, Fuji 17, Honeycrisp 16, McIntosh 16,
  Pink Lady 13, Red Delicious 12, Banana 11 — the Choose-One winner finishes LAST
  of eight. Gala and Granny Smith advance, and the Automatic Runoff goes to Gala
  6-3 with nobody at Equal Support.

  Gala is also the Condorcet winner: it beats every other candidate head-to-head.
  Live results: https://bettervoting.com/vq78wk/results

bv_test_id: BV2293
bv_election_id: vq78wk
bv_results_url: https://bettervoting.com/vq78wk/results
blocs:
  Apples: [Granny Smith, Gala, Fuji, Honeycrisp, Pink Lady, Red Delicious, McIntosh]

voting_method: STAR
num_winners: 1

ballots: |-
  Granny Smith,Gala,Fuji,Honeycrisp,Pink Lady,Red Delicious,McIntosh,Banana
  5,4,2,2,1,1,2,0   # Granny Smith first - but any apple beats a banana
  3,5,2,2,2,1,2,0   # Gala first
  3,4,5,2,2,1,2,0   # Fuji first
  3,4,2,5,1,1,3,0   # Honeycrisp first
  3,4,2,1,5,1,1,0   # Pink Lady first
  2,4,2,1,1,5,1,1   # Red Delicious first
  3,4,2,3,1,1,5,0   # McIntosh first
  1,0,0,0,0,1,0,5   # banana person
  1,0,0,0,0,0,0,5   # banana person

expected_winners:
  - Gala

# file: 07d_apples_full_menu_star.yaml