election_title: "Ossipoff's 303 — Ranked Robin on the identical ballots"

scenario_description: |-
  The SAME 303 ballots as bv2281_qycpbx_ossipoff_irv.yaml, not one mark
  changed, counted by Ranked Robin instead of Hare elimination. Same paper, same
  voters, same rankings — only the counting rule differs.

  Hare eliminates C in round 3 and elects D. Ranked Robin compares every pair
  head-to-head and elects C, who beats A 202-101, B 202-101, D 201-102 and
  E 201-102 — every rival, by roughly two to one.

  This is the pairing worth leading with when talking to someone who likes
  ranked ballots, because it asks for NOTHING from them: no new ballot, no
  scores, no relearning how to vote. The ranked ballot they already support is
  fine. It is the tabulation that threw C away.

  TRIPLE-CHECKED, all three legs agreeing on C: this LH native tally,
  BetterVoting's own RankedRobin.ts (live election qycpbx, race 2 — frozen in
  bv2281_qycpbx_bv_export.json, tieBreakType 'none'), and pref_voting's
  independent Copeland (ranked_robin_report.py — AGREE, unique leader C).

  Live on BetterVoting (Test ID BV2281): https://bettervoting.com/qycpbx
  Live results: https://bettervoting.com/qycpbx/results
bv_test_id: BV2281
bv_election_id: qycpbx
bv_results_url: https://bettervoting.com/qycpbx/results
voting_method: RankedRobin
num_winners: 1

# Identical ballot block to bv2281_qycpbx_ossipoff_irv.yaml — if you
# edit one, edit both. Source: https://rangevoting.org/rangeVirv.html section
# 12, credited to Mike Ossipoff. Claim-checked in this folder's README.md.
ballots: |-
  50:A>B>C>D>E
  51:B>A>C>D>E
  100:C>D>B>E>A
  53:D>E>C>B>A
  49:E>D>C>B>A

expected_winners:
  - C

# file: bv2281_qycpbx_ossipoff_ranked_robin.yaml