election_title: "BV2286 — Ballot B (three dogs on the paper): Choose-One elects the CAT on 33%"
scenario_description: >-
  Race 3 of 7 in the BV2286 "Three dogs and a cat" election (BetterVoting p2wggg),
  and the point of the whole set. The SAME sixty voters as races 1-2, with the same
  opinions, face the same question — but the dog side's internal disagreement is now
  written onto the paper as three breeds. Each voter still gets one mark, so the 34
  dog people (57% of the room) spread theirs over three names: Labrador 14, Golden
  Retriever 12, German Shepherd 8. The 20 cat people are undivided. Cat wins with 20
  of 60 marks — 33% — while a 57% majority of the room are dog people. Nobody changed
  their mind between race 2 and race 3; only the number of names the dog side had did.
  That is vote splitting, and it is a property of the CANDIDATE LIST, not of the topic
  and not of how anyone voted. Every other counting rule in this election holds the
  seat on the dog side.
  Live results: https://bettervoting.com/p2wggg/results
bv_test_id: BV2286
bv_election_id: p2wggg
bv_results_url: https://bettervoting.com/p2wggg/results
blocs:
  Dogs: [Labrador, Golden Retriever, German Shepherd]
voting_method: Plurality
num_winners: 1
ballots: |-
  Count:Labrador,Golden Retriever,German Shepherd,Cat,Parrot
  14:1,0,0,0,0   # dog people who lead with the Labrador
  12:0,1,0,0,0   # dog people who lead with the Golden Retriever
  8:0,0,1,0,0    # dog people who lead with the German Shepherd
  20:0,0,0,1,0   # cat people — undivided
  6:0,0,0,0,1    # parrot people
expected_winners:
  - Cat

# file: bv2286_p2wggg_b1_three_dogs_plurality.yaml