====================================================================== SOURCE FILE: crowded_field_c7_irv.yaml TABULATED FILE: crowded_field_c7_irv_tabulated.txt ====================================================================== election_title: "Crowded field, rung 7 — 7 candidates, 65 voters, counted by RCV-IRV" scenario_description: |- RUNG 3 — seven candidates, and Diego is down to 9 first choices out of 65 while still beating all six rivals head-to-head. He is eliminated; RCV-IRV elects Clara. Round 1 doubles as the Choose-One count, which elects Greta on 15 — the candidate standing furthest from the middle of the electorate, and one Diego beats 50–15 one-on-one. Counted here on the ranked ballots, deliberately. At seven candidates the 0–5 ballot in crowded_field_c7_star.yaml carries ties on most rows, so reading IRV or Choose-One off it — as that file's divergence block is forced to — measures the score-to-rank tie-break rather than the method. These are the numbers to quote. Same 65 voters and the same fixed candidate positions as crowded_field_c7_star.yaml, on a ranked ballot — the same ballots as crowded_field_c7_ranked_robin.yaml, counted by elimination instead of head-to-head. Construction: build_ladder.py in this folder. 65 voters in seven blocs at 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 (sizes 6, 10, 13, 9, 12, 8, 7); candidates fixed at Ana 1 · Bruno 6 · Clara 9 · Diego 11 · Elsa 14 · Felix 16 · Greta 22; utility = minus distance; scores = each bloc's own min-max scaling onto 0–5. Nothing is tuned, and no count at any rung is settled by a tie-break. voting_method: RCV_IRV num_winners: 1 lot_numbers: [Ana, Bruno, Clara, Diego, Elsa, Felix, Greta] ballots: |- 6:Ana>Bruno>Clara>Diego>Elsa>Felix>Greta # bloc at 0 10:Bruno>Ana>Clara>Diego>Elsa>Felix>Greta # bloc at 4 13:Clara>Bruno>Diego>Elsa>Ana>Felix>Greta # bloc at 8 9:Diego>Elsa>Clara>Felix>Bruno>Greta>Ana # bloc at 12 12:Felix>Elsa>Diego>Greta>Clara>Bruno>Ana # bloc at 16 8:Greta>Felix>Elsa>Diego>Clara>Bruno>Ana # bloc at 20 7:Greta>Felix>Elsa>Diego>Clara>Bruno>Ana # bloc at 24 expected_winners: - Clara ====================================================================== TABULATION RESULTS ====================================================================== --- RCV / Instant-Runoff Voting (single winner) --- Crowded field, rung 7 — 7 candidates, 65 voters, counted by RCV-IRV Tabulating 65 ballots (ranked ballots). ROUND 1 Candidate Votes Status ----------- ------- -------- Greta 15 Hopeful Clara 13 Hopeful Felix 12 Hopeful Bruno 10 Hopeful Diego 9 Hopeful Ana 6 Rejected Elsa 0 Rejected ROUND 2 Candidate Votes Status ----------- ------- -------- Bruno 16 Hopeful Greta 15 Hopeful Clara 13 Hopeful Felix 12 Hopeful Diego 9 Rejected Ana 0 Rejected Elsa 0 Rejected ROUND 3 Candidate Votes Status ----------- ------- -------- Clara 22 Hopeful Bruno 16 Hopeful Greta 15 Hopeful Felix 12 Rejected Diego 0 Rejected Ana 0 Rejected Elsa 0 Rejected ROUND 4 Candidate Votes Status ----------- ------- -------- Greta 27 Hopeful Clara 22 Hopeful Bruno 16 Rejected Felix 0 Rejected Diego 0 Rejected Ana 0 Rejected Elsa 0 Rejected FINAL RESULT Candidate Votes Status ----------- ------- -------- Clara 38 Elected Greta 27 Rejected Bruno 0 Rejected Felix 0 Rejected Diego 0 Rejected Ana 0 Rejected Elsa 0 Rejected Winner(s) — RCV / Instant-Runoff Voting (single winner) Clara --- Smith Set (the generalized Condorcet winner) --- The smallest group whose every member beats every candidate outside it — the honest answer to "who is even in contention?". Smith set (1 of 7): Diego Outside (6): Ana, Bruno, Clara, Elsa, Felix, Greta One member ⇒ Diego is the Condorcet winner, beating every rival head-to-head. RCV-IRV winner Clara is OUTSIDE the Smith set. ✗ Every member of the set (Diego) beats Clara head-to-head, yet RCV-IRV elected Clara anyway. RCV-IRV is not Smith-efficient (nor Condorcet-efficient) — this is the shape a center squeeze leaves behind. More: 07_Concepts/topics/smith_set.md