election_title: "Brams Example 3 — two candidates: two loud fans vs three mild preferences"

scenario_description: |-
  Example 3 of Brams & Potthoff, "The paradox of grading systems" (Public
  Choice 165, 2015): the strong paradox needs only TWO candidates. Grades
  {0..2}, five voters: two grade (Alan 2, Beth 0), three grade (Alan 0,
  Beth 1). Alan wins the grade totals 4-3 on the strength of two maximal
  fans, but three of the five voters grade Beth higher — the purest
  "strength of support vs number of supporters" collision, with no
  finalist-selection step to muddy it. STAR's automatic runoff is the
  whole story at two candidates: Beth wins it 3-2. Pure score summation
  elects Alan.

voting_method: STAR
num_winners: 1

ballots: |-
  Alan,Beth
  2,0   # two voters — all-in for Alan
  2,0
  0,1   # three voters — mildly prefer Beth
  0,1
  0,1

expected_winners:
  - Beth

# file: brams_ex3_two_candidates_c2_b5.yaml