election_title: Two bullet voters, two seats — Sequentially Spent Score
voting_method: sss
num_winners: 2

scenario_description: |
  The smallest known election where vote unitarity does real work: seven
  voters, three candidates, two seats, counted by Sequentially Spent Score.

  Round 1 seats Cy with 17 points against a Hare score quota of 17 1/2 —
  no surplus, so every Cy supporter pays their FULL Cy score out of their
  5-star budget. One ballot (2,2,5) gave Cy all 5 and exhausts to zero.

  The two Amy bullet voters scored Cy 0. They spent nothing, so vote
  unitarity — influence is only spent in exchange for representation
  gained — says they keep their entire 5-star budgets. In round 2 those
  budgets decide the seat: Amy 11 3/5 beats Bo 5 1/5.

  This profile is also the regression case for a fork-fixed engine defect
  (upstream larryhastings/starvote#19): an engine that silently drops the
  zero-score ballots when another ballot exhausts elects Bo instead of Amy.
  Correct SSS elects Amy and Cy.

ballots: |-
  Amy,Bo,Cy
  0,5,3      # Bo fan, warm on Cy
  5,0,0      # Amy bullet voter #1 — scores Cy 0
  0,3,4      # Cy leaner
  2,2,5      # Cy 5, no surplus — exhausts in round 1
  5,1,0      # Amy bullet voter #2 — scores Cy 0
  0,0,4      # Cy-only supporter
  2,2,1      # spread-out moderate

expected_winners:
  - Amy
  - Cy

# file: two_bullet_voters_sss.yaml